Journal article

Blood lipids and prostate cancer: a Mendelian randomization analysis

Caroline J Bull, Carolina Bonilla, Jeff MP Holly, Claire M Perks, Neil Davies, Philip Haycock, Oriana Hoi Yun Yu, J Brent Richards, Rosalind Eeles, Doug Easton, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Ali Amin Al Olama, Sara Benlloch, Kenneth Muir, Graham G Giles, Robert J MacInnis, Fredrik Wiklund, Henrik Gronberg, Christopher A Haiman, Johanna Schleutker Show all

Cancer Medicine | WILEY | Published : 2016

Grants

Awarded by Wellcome Trust


Awarded by Cancer Research UK programme


Awarded by University of Bristol


Awarded by European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme


Awarded by Cancer Research UK Grants


Awarded by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Cancer Post-Cancer GWAS initiative grant


Awarded by Cancer Research UK


Awarded by Medical Research Council


Awarded by National Institute for Health Research


Awarded by NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE


Funding Acknowledgements

C. J. B. is funded by the Wellcome Trust 4-year studentship WT083431MA. The Integrative Cancer Epidemiology Programme is supported by Cancer Research UK programme grant C18281/A19169. The MRC IEU is supported by the Medical Research Council and the University of Bristol (MC_UU_12013/1-9). The NIHR Bristol Nutrition Biomedical Research Unit is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and is a partnership between University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The CRUK study and PRACTICAL consortium is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme grant agreement no. 223175 (HEALTH-F2-2009-223175), Cancer Research UK Grants C5047/A7357, C1287/A10118, C5047/A3354, C5047/A10692, and C16913/A6135. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Cancer Post-Cancer GWAS initiative grant no. 1 U19 CA 148537-01 (the GAME-ON initiative) and NIHR support to the Biomedical Research Centre and The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.