Journal article
Australian Psychiatrists' Support for Psychiatric Advance Directives: Responses to a Hypothetical Vignette
M Sellars, R Fullam, C O'Leary, R Mountjoy, D Mawren, P Weller, R Newton, L Brophy, T McEwan, W Silvester
Psychiatry Psychology and Law | ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD | Published : 2017
Abstract
This study examines whether Australian psychiatrists would support requests in a psychiatric advance directive (PAD) and the reasons underlying their decisions in response to a hypothetical vignette. An online survey was completed by 143 psychiatrists. Fewer than 3 out of 10 psychiatrists supported the patient to create a PAD which requested cessation of pharmacotherapy (27%) or remaining out of hospital and not being subject to an involuntary treatment order (24%) should their depression condition deteriorate. A thematic analysis showed that patient autonomy was the strongest theme among those who supported the patient to create a PAD, whereas the clinical profile of and risk to the patient..
View full abstractGrants
Funding Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Australian Government's Department of Health under the National Palliative Care Program.