Journal article

Australian Psychiatrists' Support for Psychiatric Advance Directives: Responses to a Hypothetical Vignette

M Sellars, R Fullam, C O'Leary, R Mountjoy, D Mawren, P Weller, R Newton, L Brophy, T McEwan, W Silvester

Psychiatry Psychology and Law | ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD | Published : 2017

Abstract

This study examines whether Australian psychiatrists would support requests in a psychiatric advance directive (PAD) and the reasons underlying their decisions in response to a hypothetical vignette. An online survey was completed by 143 psychiatrists. Fewer than 3 out of 10 psychiatrists supported the patient to create a PAD which requested cessation of pharmacotherapy (27%) or remaining out of hospital and not being subject to an involuntary treatment order (24%) should their depression condition deteriorate. A thematic analysis showed that patient autonomy was the strongest theme among those who supported the patient to create a PAD, whereas the clinical profile of and risk to the patient..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers