Scholarly Contribution to Database/Website

Scott Stephenson, Michael Crommelin and Cheryl Saunders on the Judgments in Plaintiff M68-2015 v Commonwealth

Scott Stephenson, Michael Crommelin, Cheryl Saunders

Published : 2016

Abstract

This post collects three perspectives on the judgments of the High Court in Plaintiff M68/2015 v Commonwealth [2016] HCA 1 offered by Scott Stephenson, Michael Crommelin and Cheryl Saunders. These remarks emerged from a recent discussion of the case at a workshop by the Centre for Comparative Constitutional Studies at MLS convened by Adrienne Stone. Scott spoke on the joint judgment and the judgment of Keane J, Michael on Bell J and Gageler J’s opinions, and Cheryl on the dissent of Gordon J.