Scholarly Contribution to Database/Website
Scott Stephenson, Michael Crommelin and Cheryl Saunders on the Judgments in Plaintiff M68-2015 v Commonwealth
Scott Stephenson, Michael Crommelin, Cheryl Saunders
Published : 2016
This post collects three perspectives on the judgments of the High Court in Plaintiff M68/2015 v Commonwealth  HCA 1 offered by Scott Stephenson, Michael Crommelin and Cheryl Saunders. These remarks emerged from a recent discussion of the case at a workshop by the Centre for Comparative Constitutional Studies at MLS convened by Adrienne Stone. Scott spoke on the joint judgment and the judgment of Keane J, Michael on Bell J and Gageler J’s opinions, and Cheryl on the dissent of Gordon J.