Philip Morris v. Uruguay: Implications for Public Health Philip Morris Brands Sarl, Philip Morris Products SA and Abal Hermanos SA v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7, Award, 8 July 2016 (Piero Bernardini, Gary Born, James Crawford)

Tania Voon

Journal article

Philip Morris v. Uruguay: Implications for Public Health Philip Morris Brands Sarl, Philip Morris Products SA and Abal Hermanos SA v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7, Award, 8 July 2016 (Piero Bernardini, Gary Born, James Crawford)

Tania Voon

JOURNAL OF WORLD INVESTMENT & TRADE | BRILL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS | Published : 2017

DOI: 10.1163/22119000-12340039

University of Melbourne Researchers

Tania Voon Author Law

Related Projects (2)

A collaborative approach to designing regulatory measures on tobacco, alcohol & unhealthy diet: public health, international trade & investment law

Non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes account for 60 per cent of global deaths. This project will cl..

A collaborative approach to designing regulatory measures on tobacco, alcohol & unhealthy diet: public health, international trade & investment law

Non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes account for 60 per cent of global deaths. This project will cl..

Grants

Awarded by Australian Research Council

Funding Acknowledgements

PhD (Cambridge); LLM (Harvard); Grad Dip Intl L, LLB (Hons), BSc (Melbourne); AMusA; Professor, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne. This article forms part of independent research funded by the Australian Research Council pursuant to the Linkage Project scheme (project number LP120200028, in collaboration with the McCabe Centre for Law and Cancer, a joint initiative of Cancer Council Victoria and the Union for International Cancer Control). For helpful comments on an earlier draft I thank Jonathan Liberman. This article expresses my personal opinions as an academic. Any errors or omissions are mine.