Philip Morris v. Uruguay: Implications for Public Health Philip Morris Brands Sarl, Philip Morris Products SA and Abal Hermanos SA v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7, Award, 8 July 2016 (Piero Bernardini, Gary Born, James Crawford)
Journal of World Investment and Trade | BRILL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS | Published : 2017
Related Projects (2)
Awarded by Australian Research Council
PhD (Cambridge); LLM (Harvard); Grad Dip Intl L, LLB (Hons), BSc (Melbourne); AMusA; Professor, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne. This article forms part of independent research funded by the Australian Research Council pursuant to the Linkage Project scheme (project number LP120200028, in collaboration with the McCabe Centre for Law and Cancer, a joint initiative of Cancer Council Victoria and the Union for International Cancer Control). For helpful comments on an earlier draft I thank Jonathan Liberman. This article expresses my personal opinions as an academic. Any errors or omissions are mine.