Journal article
Standard vs. intensified management of heart failure to reduce healthcare costs: Results of a multicentre, randomized controlled trial
PA Scuffham, J Ball, JD Horowitz, C Won, PJ Newton, P Macdonald, J McVeigh, A Rischbieth, N Emanuele, MJ Carrington, CM Reid, YK Chan, S Stewart
European Heart Journal | OXFORD UNIV PRESS | Published : 2017
Abstract
Aims To determine if an intensified form of heart failure management programme (INT-HF-MP) based on individual profiling is superior to standard management (SM) in reducing health care costs during 12-month follow-up (primary endpoint). Methods and results A multicentre randomized trial involving 787 patients (full analysis set) discharged from four tertiary hospitals with chronic HF who were randomized to SM (n = 391) or INT-HF-MP (n = 396). Mean age was 74 ± 12 years, 65% had HF with a reduced ejection fraction (31.4 ± 8.9%) and 14% were remote-dwelling. Study groups were well matched. According to Green, Amber, Red Delineation of rIsk And Need in HF (GARDIAN-HF) profiling, regardless of l..
View full abstractGrants
Awarded by National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Acknowledgements
National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (1049133, 1041796 to S.S. and 1112829 to J.B.); and the National Heart Foundation of Australia (100950 to J.B. and 100802 to M.J.C.).