Journal article

Invited review: Recommendations for reporting intervention studies on reproductive performance in dairy cattle: Improving design, analysis, and interpretation of research on reproduction

IJ Lean, MC Lucy, JP McNamara, BJ Bradford, E Block, JM Thomson, JM Morton, P Celi, AR Rabiee, JEP Santos, WW Thatcher, SJ LeBlanc

Journal of Dairy Science | ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC | Published : 2016

Abstract

Abundant evidence from the medical, veterinary, and animal science literature demonstrates that there is substantial room for improvement of the clarity, completeness, and accuracy of reporting of intervention studies. More rigorous reporting guidelines are needed to improve the quality of data available for use in comparisons of outcomes (or meta-analyses) of multiple studies. Because of the diversity of factors that affect reproduction and the complexity of interactions between these, a systematic approach is required to design, conduct, and analyze basic and applied studies of dairy cattle reproduction. Greater consistency, clarity, completeness, and correctness of design and reporting wi..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers

Grants

Funding Acknowledgements

This study received support from Dairy Australia (Melbourne, Australia), Church and Dwight Inc. (Princeton, NJ) and Scibus (Camden, NSW, Australia). Alex Crosbie contributed to the development of Supplemental Table S3. We thank Mike Overton (Elanco Animal Health, Athens, GA) and Robert Van Saun (Pennsylvania State University, University Park) for contributions. The authors have no conflict of interest in producing this document.