Journal article

The Effects of Closed-Loop Brain Implants on Autonomy and Deliberation: What are the Risks of Being Kept in the Loop?

F Gilbert, T O'Brien, M Cook

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics | CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS | Published : 2018

Abstract

A new generation of implantable brain-computer interfaces (BCI) devices have been tested for the first time in a human clinical trial, with significant success. These intelligent implants detect specific neuronal activity patterns, such as an epileptic seizure, and provide information to help patients to respond to the upcoming neuronal events. By forecasting a seizure, the technology keeps patients in the decisional loop; the device gives control to patients on how to respond and decide on a therapeutic course ahead of time. Being kept in the decisional loop can positively increase patients' quality of life; however, doing so does not come free of ethical concerns. There is currently a lack..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers

Grants

Awarded by National Science Foundation


Funding Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Australian Research Council (DECRA award project number DE150101390) and the National Science Foundation (NSF Award #EEC-1028725). Funding from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence Scheme (Project Number CE 140100012) is gratefully acknowledged. In addition, we thank the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics editor and reviewers, Tim Krahn, and the neuroethics team at the University of Washington for their valuable comments. Dr. Gilbert's ORCID number is 0000-0003-0524-8649.