Journal article
Safety of pazopanib and sunitinib in treatment-naive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Asian versus non-Asian subgroup analysis of the COMPARZ trial
J Guo, J Jin, M Oya, H Uemura, S Takahashi, K Tatsugami, SY Rha, JL Lee, J Chung, HY Lim, HC Wu, YH Chang, A Azad, ID Davis, MJ Carrasco-Alfonso, B Nanua, J Han, Q Ahmad, R Motzer
Journal of Hematology and Oncology | BIOMED CENTRAL LTD | Published : 2018
Abstract
Background: The international, phase 3 COMPARZ study demonstrated that pazopanib and sunitinib have comparable efficacy as first-line therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, but that safety and quality-of-life profiles favor pazopanib. Our report analyzed pazopanib and sunitinib safety in Asian and non-Asian subpopulations. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive pazopanib 800 mg once daily (continuous dosing) or sunitinib 50 mg once daily in 6-week cycles (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off). Results: Safety population was composed of 363 Asian patients and 703 non-Asian patients. Asian patients had similar duration of exposure to either drug compared with non-Asian patients, ..
View full abstractGrants
Awarded by National Health and Medical Research Council
Funding Acknowledgements
Financial support for this study was provided by GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; pazopanib is an asset of Novartis AG as of March 1, 2015. Financial support for medical editorial assistance was provided by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Ian D. Davis is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Practitioner Fellowship (APP1102604). Patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were supported in part by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant/Core Grant (P30 CA008748).