Journal article
Appraising the quality of systematic reviews for age-related macular degeneration interventions a systematic review
LE Downie, E Makrai, Y Bonggotgetsakul, LJ Dirito, K Kristo, MAN Pham, M You, K Verspoor, MJ Pianta
JAMA Ophthalmology | AMER MEDICAL ASSOC | Published : 2018
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of vision impairment. It is imperative that AMD care is timely, appropriate, and evidence-based. It is thus essential that AMD systematic reviews are robust; however, little is known about the quality of this literature. OBJECTIVES To investigate the methodological quality of systematic reviews of AMD intervention studies, and to evaluate their use for guiding evidence-based care. EVIDENCE REVIEW This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. All studies that self-identified as a systematic review in their title or abstract or were categorized as a systema..
View full abstractRelated Projects (2)
Grants
Awarded by National Institute for Health Research
Funding Acknowledgements
This study was funded by a National Health and Medical Research Translating Research Into Practice Fellowship (grant APP1091833; Dr Downie) and a 2015 Macular Disease Foundation Australia grant (Dr Downie).