A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer

Giovanni Montesano; Susan R Bryan; David P Crabb; Paolo Fogagnolo; Francesco Oddone; Allison M McKendrick; Andrew Turpin; Paolo Lanzetta; Andrea Perdicchi; Chris A Johnson; David F Garway-Heath; Paolo Brusini; Luca M Rossetti

Journal article

A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer

Giovanni Montesano, Susan R Bryan, David P Crabb, Paolo Fogagnolo, Francesco Oddone, Allison M McKendrick, Andrew Turpin, Paolo Lanzetta, Andrea Perdicchi, Chris A Johnson, David F Garway-Heath, Paolo Brusini, Luca M Rossetti

OPHTHALMOLOGY | ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC | Published : 2019

DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.010

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate relative diagnostic precision and test-retest variability of 2 devices, the Compass (CMP, CenterVue, Padova, Italy) fundus perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA, Zeiss, Dublin, CA), in detecting glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON). DESIGN: Multicenter, cross-sectional, case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: We sequentially enrolled 499 patients with glaucoma and 444 normal subjects to analyze relative precision. A separate group of 44 patients with glaucoma and 54 normal subjects was analyzed to assess test-retest variability. METHODS: One eye of recruited subjects was tested with the index tests: HFA (Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm [SITA] standard strate..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers

Allison McKendrick Author Optometry and Vision Sciences

Andrew Turpin Author Computing and Information Systems

Grants

Funding Acknowledgements

CenterVue, Padua, Italy, sponsored the study. The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research, data analysis, interpretation of the data, or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The contribution of IRCCS G. B. Bietti Foundation to this work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health and by Fondazione Roma.