Journal article

Larger gains from improved management over sparing-sharing for tropical forests

Rebecca K Runting, undefined Ruslandi, Bronson W Griscom, Matthewj Struebig, Musnanda Satar, Erik Meijaard, Zuzana Burivalova, Susan M Cheyne, Nicolas J Deere, Edward T Game, FE Putz, Jessie A Wells, Andreas Wilting, Marc Ancrenaz, Peter Ellis, Faisal AA Khan, Sara M Leavitt, Andrew J Marshall, Hugh P Possingham, James EM Watson Show all



Tropical forests are globally important for both biodiversity conservation and the production of economically valuable wood products. To deliver both simultaneously, two contrasting approaches have been suggested: one partitions forests (sparing); the other integrates both objectives in the same location (sharing). To date, the ‘sparing or sharing’ debate has focused on agricultural landscapes, with scant attention paid to forest management. We explore the delivery of biodiversity and wood products in a continuum of sparing-to-sharing scenarios, using spatial optimization with set economic returns in East Kalimantan, Indonesia—a biodiversity hotspot. We found that neither sparing nor sharing..

View full abstract


Awarded by Australian Research Council

Awarded by Niche Research Grant Scheme

Funding Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Australian Research Council Discovery Project grant no. DP160101397. Support was also provided by funding from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation and the Science for Nature and People Partnership (SNAPP), a partnership of The Nature Conservancy, the Wildlife Conservation Society and the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis at the University of California, Santa Barbara ( was supported by a Niche Research Grant Scheme, grant no. NRGS/1087/2-13(01). We would like to thank A. Klassen, C. Romero, N. Wolff and all members of the SNAPP Forest Sparing or Sharing team for useful discussions.