Journal article

Supporting Robust, Rigorous, and Reliable Reviewing as the Cornerstone of Our Profession: Introducing a Competency Framework for Peer Review

Tine Köhler, Maria González-Morales, George Banks, Ernest O'Boyle, Joseph Allen, Ruchi Sinha, Sang Eun Woo, Lisa Gulick

Industrial and Organizational Psychology: perspectives on science and practice | Cambridge University Press (CUP) | Published : 2020

Abstract

Peer review is a critical component toward facilitating a robust science in industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology. Peer review exists beyond academic publishing in organizations, university departments, grant agencies, classrooms, and many more work contexts. Reviewers are responsible for judging the quality of research conducted and submitted for evaluation. Furthermore, they are responsible for treating authors and their work with respect, in a supportive and developmental manner. Given its central role in our profession, it is curious that we do not have formalized review guidelines or standards and that most of us never receive formal training in peer reviewing. To support this ..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers