Journal article
Treatment augmentation for posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review
O Metcalf, C Stone, M Hinton, M O’Donnell, M Hopwood, A McFarlane, D Forbes, D Kartal, L Watson, I Freijah, T Varker
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice | EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION-AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC | Published : 2020
DOI: 10.1111/cpsp.12310
Open access
Abstract
This systematic review examined the efficacy of all augmentation approaches for first-line posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) interventions. From 9,890 records, 34 trials were eligible for inclusion, covering 28 different augmentation approaches. Overall, augmentation approaches were ineffective if they targeted a mechanism similar to the first-line treatment. Augmentation approaches combining two guideline-recommended treatments were largely ineffective, reflecting ceiling effects. Pharmacological augmentation approaches targeting fear extinction mechanisms were largely ineffective, or worsened outcomes relative to prolonged exposure alone, as these approaches may inadvertently strengthen..
View full abstractGrants
Funding Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Centenary of Anzac Centre, a Department of Veterans' Affairs funded initiative of Phoenix Australia.