Journal article

Measurement invariance of the moral vitalism scale across 28 cultural groups

Maksim Rudnev, Christin-Melanie Vauclair, Samira Aminihajibashi, Maja Becker, Michal Bilewicz, Jose Luis Castellanos Guevara, Emma Collier-Baker, Carla Crespo, Paul Eastwick, Ronald Fischer, Malte Friese, Angel Gomez, Valeschka Guerra, Katja Hanke, Nic Hooper, Li-li Huang, Minoru Karasawa, Peter Kuppens, Steve Loughnan, Mujde Peker Show all

PLoS One | PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE | Published : 2020

Abstract

Moral vitalism refers to a tendency to view good and evil as actual forces that can influence people and events. The Moral Vitalism Scale had been designed to assess moral vitalism in a brief survey form. Previous studies established the reliability and validity of the scale in US-American and Australian samples. In this study, the cross-cultural comparability of the scale was tested across 28 different cultural groups worldwide through measurement invariance tests. A series of exact invariance tests marginally supported partial metric invariance, however, an approximate invariance approach provided evidence of partial scalar invariance for a 5-item measure. The established level of measurem..

View full abstract

Grants

Awarded by Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia


Awarded by Australian Research Council


Funding Acknowledgements

The work of the first author (MR) is an output of a research project implemented as part of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University). The work of the second author (CMV) was supported by the Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia; IF/00346/2014. The work of BB and WBS was supported by the Australian Research Council's Discovery Projects funding scheme (Brock Bastian, Paul Bain, & William B. Swann Jr.: DP110102632). Jose Luis Castellanos Guevara was affiliated with a commercial institution "ConSol" and received support in the form of salary from "ConSol". The funders provided support in the form of salaries for the mentioned, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the `author contributions' section.