Journal article

'It's not worse than eating them': the limits of analogy in bioethics

Julian J Koplin

Monash Bioethics Review | SPRINGER HEIDELBERG | Published : 2020

Abstract

Bioethicists often defend novel practices by drawing analogies with practices that we are already familiar with and currently tolerate. If some novel practice is less bad than some widely-accepted practice, then (it is argued) we cannot rightly reject it. Using the bioethics literature on xenotransplantation and interspecies blastocyst complementation as a case study, I show how this style of argument can go awry. The key problem is that our moral intuitions about familiar practices can be distorted by their seeming normality. When considering the ethics of emerging technologies and novel practices, we should remain open to the possibility that our moral views about familiar practices are mi..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers

Grants

Funding Acknowledgements

JK, through his involvement with the Murdoch Children's Research Institute, received funding through from the Victorian State Government through the Operational Infrastructure Support (OIS) Program.