Journal article
Is multileaf collimator tracking or gating a better intrafraction motion adaptation strategy? An analysis of the TROG 15.01 stereotactic prostate ablative radiotherapy with KIM (SPARK) trial
EA Hewson, DT Nguyen, R O'Brien, PR Poulsen, JT Booth, P Greer, T Eade, A Kneebone, G Hruby, T Moodie, AJ Hayden, SL Turner, N Hardcastle, S Siva, KH Tai, J Martin, PJ Keall
Radiotherapy and Oncology | ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD | Published : 2020
Abstract
Purpose: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) has recently emerged as a favourable treatment option for prostate cancer patients. With higher doses delivered over fewer fractions, motion adaptation is a requirement for accurate delivery of SABR. This study compared the efficacy of multileaf collimator (MLC) tracking vs. gating as a real-time motion adaptation strategy for prostate SABR patients enrolled in a clinical trial. Methods: Forty-four prostate cancer patients treated over five fractions in the TROG 15.01 SPARK trial were analysed in this study. Forty-nine fractions were treated using MLC tracking and 166 fractions were treated using beam gating and couch shifts. A time-resolved..
View full abstractGrants
Awarded by Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia
Funding Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Cancer Australia (APP1081534), the Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, and the National Health & Medical Research Council of Australia (APP1112096, APP1138807).