Journal article

Levelized Cost of CO2 Captured Using Five Physical Solvents in Pre-combustion Applications

HE Ashkanani, R Wang, W Shi, NS Siefert, RL Thompson, K Smith, JA Steckel, IK Gamwo, D Hopkinson, K Resnik, BI Morsi

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control | Elsevier | Published : 2020

Abstract

Aspen Plus v8.8 was used to perform techno-economic analysis (TEA) of a CO2 capture process from a typical fuel gas stream in a 543-MW pre-combustion power plant using five different physical solvents (Selexol, PEGPDMS-1, NMP, [aPy][Tf2N] and [hmim][Tf2N]). The process included a countercurrent packed-bed absorber operating under high-pressure over a wide range of temperatures and three pressure-swing flash drums for solvent regeneration. Two packings, Mellapak 250Y and IMTP50, were used and the Levelized costs of CO2 captured (LCOC) were calculated. The simulation results indicated that using Mellapak 250Y exhibited lower LCOC values than those when using IMTP50 for the five solvents under ..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers

Grants

Awarded by U.S. Department of Energy


Funding Acknowledgements

This technical effort was performed in support of the US Department of Energy's ongoing research in Carbon Capture. The research was executed through the NETL Research and Innovation Center's Transformational Carbon Capture FWP under the RSS contract 89243318CFE000003. The authors would like to thank Dr. Randall Gemmen, Associate Deputy Director for Energy Conversion at NETL, and Mr. Walter Shelton, Engineer in the Systems Engineering & Analysis group at NETL, for their meticulous internal review of this manuscript.