Journal article

A comparison of gap-filling algorithms for eddy covariance fluxes and their drivers

A Mahabbati, J Beringer, M Leopold, I McHugh, J Cleverly, P Isaac, A Izady

Geoscientific Instrumentation Methods and Data Systems | Published : 2021

Abstract

The errors and uncertainties associated with gap-filling algorithms of water, carbon, and energy fluxes data have always been one of the main challenges of the global network of microclimatological tower sites that use the eddy covariance (EC) technique. To address these concerns and find more efficient gap-filling algorithms, we reviewed eight algorithms to estimate missing values of environmental drivers and nine algorithms for the three major fluxes typically found in EC time series. We then examined the algorithms' performance for different gap-filling scenarios utilising the data from five EC towers during 2013. This research's objectives were (a) to evaluate the impact of the gap lengt..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers

Grants

Funding Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Terrestrial Ecosystems Research Network (TERN) (https://www.tern.org.au/, last access: 19 August 2019) and the OzFlux network as a part of TERN for supporting the grants and providing the required data, respectively. Atbin Mahabbati also personally thanks Prajwal Kalfe, Caroline Johnson, and Cacilia Ewenz for their support regarding Python programming, English academic writing, and PyFluxPro technical issues.