Journal article

Outcomes in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for imperative vs elective indications

Jo-Lynn S Tan, Niranjan Sathianathen, Marcus Cumberbatch, Prokar Dasgupta, Alexandre Mottrie, Ronney Abaza, Koon Ho Rha, Thyavihally B Yuvaraja, Dipen J Parekh, Umberto Capitanio, Rajesh Ahlawat, Sudhir Rawal, Nicolo M Buffi, Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman, Kris K Maes, Gagan Gautham, Francesco Porpiglia, Levent Turkeri, Mahendra Bhandari, Benjamin Challacombe Show all

BJU INTERNATIONAL | WILEY | Published : 2021


OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare peri-operative outcomes of patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for imperative vs elective indications. PATIENT AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a multinational database of 3802 adults who underwent RAPN for elective and imperative indications. Laparoscopic or open partial nephrectomy (PN) were excluded. Baseline data for age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score and PADUA score were examined. Patients undergoing RAPN for an imperative indication were matched to those having surgery for an elective indication using propensity scores in a 1:3 ratio. Primary outcomes included organ ischaemic tim..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers