Journal article

Response time modelling reveals evidence for multiple, distinct sources of moral decision caution

M Andrejević, JP White, D Feuerriegel, S Laham, S Bode

Cognition | Published : 2022

Abstract

People are often cautious in delivering moral judgements of others' behaviours, as falsely accusing others of wrongdoing can be costly for social relationships. Caution might further be present when making judgements in information-dynamic environments, as contextual updates can change our minds. This study investigated the processes with which moral valence and context expectancy drive caution in moral judgements. Across two experiments, participants (N = 122) made moral judgements of others' sharing actions. Prior to judging, participants were informed whether contextual information regarding the deservingness of the recipient would follow. We found that participants slowed their moral jud..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers

Grants

Awarded by Australian Research Council


Funding Acknowledgements

Data of all participants, materials including the instructions and the task code, as well as the analyses scripts that support the findings of this study are publicly available on an Open Science Framework (OSF) repository (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/EPD63). This study was supported by an Australian Research Council grant (ARC DP160103353) to S.B. We have no competing interests. We thank Pragya Arora for her help with data collection as well as Gabriel Ong and William Turner for helpful discussions.