Journal article

Treat-and-Extend Versus Pro re nata Regimens of Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparative Study from Routine Clinical Practice

E Debourdeau, H Beylerian, V Nguyen, D Barthelmes, M Gillies, PH Gabrielle, S Vujosevic, L Otoole, M Puzo, C Creuzot-Garcher, B Wolff, V Daien, MJR Cid, C Hooper, J ODay, A Harper, HB Morros, G Garay-Aramburu, ED De Durana Santa Coloma, P Hinchcliffe Show all

Ophthalmology and Therapy | Published : 2024

Open access

Abstract

Introduction: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is generally given using pro re nata or “treat-and-extend” (T&E) regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Randomized clinical trials have reported that T&E is superior to Pro re nata (PRN), but results from clinical trials may not always be replicated in clinical practice. Real-world data comparing T&E and PRN regimens for nAMD are limited. The objective of this work was to report 24-month outcomes of PRN versus T&E regimens for ranibizumab and aflibercept to treat nAMD in routine clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a prospectively designed observational outcomes r..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers