Journal article
Conservation planning with dynamic threats: The role of spatial design and priority setting for species' persistence
P Visconti, RL Pressey, DB Segan, BA Wintle
Biological Conservation | Published : 2010
Abstract
Conservation actions frequently need to be scheduled because both funding and implementation capacity are limited. Two approaches to scheduling are possible. Maximizing gain (MaxGain) which attempts to maximize representation with protected areas, or minimizing loss (MinLoss) which attempts to minimize total loss both inside and outside protected areas. Conservation planners also choose between setting priorities based solely on biodiversity pattern and considering surrogates for biodiversity processes such as connectivity. We address both biodiversity processes and habitat loss in a scheduling framework by comparing four different prioritization strategies defined by MaxGain and MinLoss app..
View full abstractGrants
Funding Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the University of Melbourne and the Lower Hunter and Central Coast Regional Environment Management Strategy administration for providing the environmental layers and the species distribution maps. We thank Natalie C. Ban and Carlo Rondinini for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. PV was supported by a visiting scholar grant from University La Sapienza, Rome and by an IDP student mobility postgraduate scholarship. BW was supported by the CERF Hub AEDA and an ARC Fellowship.