Journal article
TEASIng apart alien species risk assessments: A framework for best practices
B Leung, N Roura-Pascual, S Bacher, J Heikkilä, L Brotons, MA Burgman, K Dehnen-Schmutz, F Essl, PE Hulme, DM Richardson, D Sol, M Vilà
Ecology Letters | Published : 2012
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12003
Abstract
Some alien species cause substantial impacts, yet most are innocuous. Given limited resources, forecasting risks from alien species will help prioritise management. Given that risk assessment (RA) approaches vary widely, a synthesis is timely to highlight best practices. We reviewed quantitative and scoring RAs, integrating > 300 publications into arguably the most rigorous quantitative RA framework currently existing, and mapping each study onto our framework, which combines Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread and Impact (TEASI). Quantitative models generally measured single risk components (78% of studies), often focusing on Establishment alone (79%). Although dominant in academia,..
View full abstractGrants
Awarded by European Science Foundation Standing Committee for Life, Earth and Environmental Sciences
Awarded by Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (Government of Catalonia)
Awarded by RIXFUTUR
Funding Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Girona working group members (Girona 2011), T. Gharajehdaghipoor and J. Knox, the European Science Foundation Standing Committee for Life, Earth and Environmental Sciences (EW10-063 - LESC) and Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (Government of Catalonia; 2010ARCS00312) grants to NRP and DS; the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and Canadian Aquatic Invasive Species Network (CAISN) grants to BL; and the project Consolider Montes (CSD2008-00040) to NRP, LB, DS, MV, RIXFUTUR (CGL2009-7515) and RNM-4031to MV.