Journal article
Overview of methods for comparing the efficacies of drugs in the absence of head-to-head clinical trial data
H Kim, L Gurrin, Z Ademi, D Liew
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | Published : 2014
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12150
Abstract
In most therapeutic areas, multiple drug options are increasingly becoming available, but there is often a lack of evidence from head-to-head clinical trials that allows for direct comparison of the efficacy and/or safety of one drug vs. another. This review provides an introduction to, and overview of, common methods used for comparing drugs in the absence of head-to-head clinical trial evidence. Naïve direct comparisons are in most instances inappropriate and should only be used for exploratory purposes and when no other options are possible. Adjusted indirect comparisons are currently the most commonly accepted method and use links through one or more common comparators. Mixed treatment c..
View full abstractGrants
Funding Acknowledgements
All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare HK had scholarship support from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) for the submitted work, the authors have no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years and the authors have no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.