Journal article

A dual-centre, cohort comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy

MS Khan, B Challacombe, O Elhage, P Rimington, B Coker, D Murphy, A Grieve, P Dasgupta

International Journal of Clinical Practice | Published : 2012

Abstract

Introduction: The role of minimally invasive radical cystectomy as opposed to open surgery for bladder cancer is not yet established. We present comparative outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy Material and Methods: Prospective cohort comparison of 158 patients from 2003-2008 undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC) (n = 52), laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) (n = 58) or robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) (n = 48) performed by a team of three surgeons at two hospitals. Peri-operative data, complication rates, length of hospital stay, oncological outcome (including lymph node status) and survival were recorded. Statistical analyses were adjusted t..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers

Grants

Awarded by Medical Research Council


Funding Acknowledgements

The Guy's and St. Thomas' Charity, The Urological Foundation for project grants. PDG acknowledges financial support from the Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre award to Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King's College London and King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.