Analysing clinical reasoning characteristics using a combined methods approach

Abstract

Background: Despite a major research focus on clinical reasoning over the last several decades, a method of evaluating the clinical reasoning process that is both objective and comprehensive is yet to be developed.The aim of this study was to test whether a dual approach, using two measures of clinical reasoning, the Clinical Reasoning Problem (CRP) and the Script Concordance Test (SCT), provides a valid, reliable and targeted analysis of clinical reasoning characteristics to facilitate the development of diagnostic thinking in medical students. Methods. Three groups of participants, general practitioners, and third and fourth (final) year medical students completed 20 on-line clinical scena..