Journal article
Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy
M Sheehan, C Timlin, K Peach, A Binik, W Puthenparampil, M Lodge, S Kehoe, M Brada, N Burnet, S Clarke, A Crellin, M Dunn, P Fossati, S Harris, M Hocken, T Hope, J Ives, T Kamada, AJ London, R Miller Show all
Journal of Medical Ethics | Published : 2014
Abstract
The use of charged-particle radiation therapy (CPRT) is an increasingly important development in the treatment of cancer. One of the most pressing controversies about the use of this technology is whether randomised controlled trials are required before this form of treatment can be considered to be the treatment of choice for a wide range of indications. Equipoise is the key ethical concept in determining which research studies are justied. However, there is a good deal of disagreement about how this concept is best understood and applied in the specic case of CPRT. This report is a position statement on these controversies that arises out of a workshop held at Wolfson College, Oxford in Au..
View full abstractGrants
Awarded by National Institute for Health Research
Funding Acknowledgements
Oxford Martin School, Wellcome Trust (WT097468MA), the Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology and the Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre.