Journal article

Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study

P Fenaux, GJ Mufti, E Hellstrom-Lindberg, V Santini, C Finelli, A Giagounidis, R Schoch, N Gattermann, G Sanz, A List, SD Gore, JF Seymour, JM Bennett, J Byrd, J Backstrom, L Zimmerman, D McKenzie, CL Beach, LR Silverman

Lancet Oncology | ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC | Published : 2009

Abstract

Background: Drug treatments for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes provide no survival advantage. In this trial, we aimed to assess the effect of azacitidine on overall survival compared with the three commonest conventional care regimens. Methods: In a phase III, international, multicentre, controlled, parallel-group, open-label trial, patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes were randomly assigned one-to-one to receive azacitidine (75 mg/m2 per day for 7 days every 28 days) or conventional care (best supportive care, low-dose cytarabine, or intensive chemotherapy as selected by investigators before randomisation). Patients were stratified by French-American-Britis..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers