Journal article
Future Directions for Intra-Arterial Therapy for Acute Ischaemic Stroke: Is There Life after Three Negative Randomized Controlled Studies?
Julian Maingard, Bernard Yan
INTERVENTIONAL NEUROLOGY | KARGER | Published : 2013
DOI: 10.1159/000356087
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The three randomised controlled trials, Interventional Management of Stroke III (IMS3), Mechanical Retrieval and Revascularization of Stroke Clots Using Embolectomy (MR RESCUE) and Synthesis Expanasion: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Intra-Arterial Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischaemic Stroke (SYNTHESIS EXP) showed no significant difference in clinical outcomes comparing intra-arterial (IA) therapy with intravenous thrombolysis. This article will explore the reasons for failure to show superiority of IA therapy. SUMMARY: There are many reasons for the disappointing results of the three randomised controlled trials. Opposing views on IA therapy exist. Critics argue ..
View full abstract