Journal article
Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: Backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence
J Evans, NJ Hannan, TA Edgell, BJ Vollenhoven, PJ Lutjen, T Osianlis, LA Salamonsen, LJF Rombauts
Human Reproduction Update | Published : 2014
Abstract
Background: Improvements in vitrification now make frozen embryo transfers (FETs) a viable alternative to fresh embryo transfer, with reports fromobservational studies and randomized controlled trials suggesting that: (i) the endometrium in stimulated cycles is not optimally prepared for implantation; (ii) pregnancy rates are increased following FET and (iii) perinatal outcomes are less affected after FET. methods: This review integrates and discusses the available clinical and scientific evidence supporting embryo transfer in a natural cycle. results: Laboratory-based studies demonstrate morphological and molecular changes to the endometrium and reduced responsiveness of the endometriumtohC..
View full abstractGrants
Awarded by NHMRC of Australia
Funding Acknowledgements
Funding for work in the authors' laboratories has been provided by the NHMRC of Australia [programme grant #494802, project grants #1047056 and #047756 as well as fellowships grants #1002028 (L.A.S.) and #629927 (N.J.H)], the Monash IVF Research and Education Foundation, a Merck-Serono Grant for Fertility Innovation and the Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program.